LE MANS 24 hours 2010 TODAY

[Cheeveer]

Bottom post of the previous page:

Behold:



Reinhold Joest.

[erwin greven]

AUDI 1-2-3!!!

Never expected, because the Peugeots were much faster the whole weekend. Audi could only win if there were no Peugeots at the finish. And that was exactly what happened. No Pug at the finish.

[Cheeveer]

Truly, a great race

[DoubleFault]

Cracking race. Pity I missed between 1am and 8am though, seems that when most of the drama happened.

[Cheeveer]

Cracking race. Pity I missed between 1am and 8am though, seems that when most of the drama happened.

Yep, same here. Too bad that I was sleepy between those hours.

[Everso Biggyballies]

LOL I fell asleep about a minute after the three Audis came into pit lane for their formation pit stop after the last Pug flamed out. Missed the formation finish and the podiums.

Woke up half way through the F1 Preview show.

[Cheeveer]

Incredibly complex problems for the Peugeot's...

Bruno Famin (Technical Director, Peugeot Sport): “To begin with, with regard to the N°3 908 HDi FAP which retired 2½ hours into the race, we have found a quality-related problem concerning the production of the tub at the point where the lower front-right suspension wishbone is attached to the chassis. This is the same tub that won the 2009 Le Mans 24 Hours and the 2010 1,000km de Spa-Francorchamps, and – like every 908 chassis – is regularly inspected at the factory using sophisticated tools that enable us to detect ageing or damage to the carbon. The problem in this case, however, was due to a totally undetectable defect which resulted in a premature and sudden failure of the mounting point.

“As far as the engines are concerned, it didn’t take us long to confirm that all three engines suffered the same problem, i.e. conrod failure, although the cylinders that were affected were different. Further investigation has just revealed that the particularly severe conditions encountered at Le Mans in June led to excessive overload of the V12s in question.

“Indeed, the track benefited from high levels of grip this year, so the engines spent longer at full throttle than we expected. At the same time, the weather stayed cool and, unlike previous years, the air/air intercoolers did not become clogged up. The filling of the combustion chambers remained extremely efficient throughout, which in turn meant that the performance delivered by the engines was particularly high. Okay, the conditions were the same for all competitors, but we were running new conrods this year. That said, they had undergone thorough testing on the bench and during the numerous on-track simulations we carried out upstream of the race.

“We didn’t observe the slightest problem with them during any of these test sessions, so there was nothing to suggest that we were closer to the limit than we had imagined. As it turned out, the race conditions tipped us to the wrong side of that limit. Having contested the Le Mans 24 Hours three times, we had every faith in our processes. The evidence now points to the fact that this wasn’t the case and that despite our growing experience, it is very difficult to master absolutely everything. The conditions we face at Le Mans differ every year, as do the constraints to which the cars are subjected. It is clear that we need to reinforce our validation procedures.”

http://www.planetlemans.com/2010/07/05/ ... r-le-mans/