Top 10 Lotus F1 cars ranked: 49, 72, 79 and more

Racing events, drivers, cars or anything else from the past.
Post Reply
User avatar
Everso Biggyballies
Legendary Member
Legendary Member
Posts: 48992
Joined: 18 years ago
Real Name: Chris
Favourite Motorsport: Anything that goes left and right.
Favourite Racing Car: Too Many to mention
Favourite Driver: Kimi,Niki,Jim(none called Michael)
Favourite Circuit: Nordschleife, Spa, Mt Panorama.
Car(s) Currently Owned: Audi SQ5 3.0L V6 TwinTurbo
Location: Just moved 3 klms further away so now 11 klms from Albert Park, Melbourne.

Top 10 Lotus F1 cars ranked: 49, 72, 79 and more

#1

Post by Everso Biggyballies »

I know we have done our own reviews of drivers and how we ranked their individual cars, so I thought this article in Autosport regarding their top 10 ranked cars might be of interest. Do we agree with their findings and reasons? It only covers the "original" Lotus, ie up to 1995 or thereabouts..

Lotus can recall its own hall of fame for Formula 1 cars across its illustrious history which boasts some of the most dominant and successful efforts the championship has ever seen. But which one comes out on top? Kevin Turner picks the best and explains why

Image


Top 10 Lotus F1 cars ranked: 49, 72, 79 and more

More than a quarter of a century since the original Team Lotus closed its doors, the legendary British constructor is still one of the most successful in Formula 1 history.

The 79 world championship F1 wins scored by the firm founded by Colin Chapman puts Lotus fifth in the table, behind Ferrari, McLaren, Mercedes and Williams, and one spot ahead of Red Bull. It also scored seven constructors’ and six drivers’ crowns, and in the 1970s briefly overtook Ferrari as the most successful F1 manufacturer in terms of victories.

To produce this list we considered a number of factors, including the level of success each car scored, how important and innovative they were, and how iconic they are. We have ignored the times when the Lotus name has been brought back, first by the Malaysian-backed team that later became Caterham and then the Enstone-based ‘Lotus’ between its different Renault eras, so this is strictly 1958-94.

Note: Wins are world championship grand prix wins, non-championship successes are not included.

10. Lotus 107
Image
Year: 1992-94
Wins: 0
Drivers’ titles: 0
Constructors’ titles: 0

Lotus, under different management, was in its declining years in the early 1990s, but Chris Murphy’s 107 was a neat, attractive and competitive car that was a points scorer across two seasons and lifted Lotus back into the top six of the world championship.

With the 102, Lotus had slumped to 13th fastest in 1991, but it leapt to sixth the following year. Mika Hakkinen and Johnny Herbert used the customer Ford HB V8-engined 107 and were often threats for points – when they were only awarded to the top six. Reliability was a problem, but the 107 was good enough to take Lotus to fifth in the constructors’ championship, its best result since 1988.

The car was developed into 107B spec for 1993 and ran active suspension, with Herbert scoring the lion’s share of the points alongside new team-mate Alex Zanardi.

Budget restrictions meant Lotus was never likely to challenge the era’s big hitters Williams, McLaren, Benetton and Ferrari, but had topped the midfield in 1992 and was sixth overall, behind Ligier, the following year.

The 107C, now with Mugen-Honda V10 power, started the 1994 campaign, after all the gizmos had been banned. It was replaced by the 109, but Team Lotus was already on the financial slippery slope that led to its closure at the end of the season.

9. Lotus-Climax 12
Image

Year: 1958
Wins: 0
Drivers’ titles: 0
Constructors’ titles: 0

Chapman always wanted to push the boundaries so it’s perhaps no surprise that his first F1 car wasn’t conservative. It was lightweight – something that would become a Lotus hallmark – had disc brakes, magnesium ‘wobbly web’ wheels and a novel sequential-style gearbox.


Originally an F2 car, the 12 had to make do with a two-litre Coventry Climax engine when Team Lotus made its first F1 world championship start at the 1958 Monaco Grand Prix. That grew to 2.2-litres, but it was still underpowered compared to its 2.5-litre rivals.

Cliff Allison finished in the top 10 in all but one of his 1958 world championship starts and took the team’s first points at the Belgian GP. That race could have yielded even more as winner Tony Brooks suffered gearbox failure as his Vanwall crossed the line, second-placed Mike Hawthorn’s Ferrari’s engine gave up on the final tour, and the suspension of Stuart Lewis-Evans’s Vanwall collapsed.

“That remarkable little Lotus was never nearer creating a major sensation!” reported Autosport’s Gregor Grant.

Chapman introduced the 16, which has proved its worth in historic racing, before the end of the season but reliability would stymy the sleek machine. That would be a recurring problem throughout the years of Lotus innovation, but the 12 had been a signal of intent.

8. Lotus-Honda 99T
Image
Year: 1987
Wins: 2
Drivers’ titles: 0
Constructors titles: 0

The last great F1 Lotus innovator? The team had been developing active suspension for several years and put the system, which brought extra weight but was more comfortable particularly on street circuits, on its 1987 challenger.

The 98T had won two races in 1986, finishing third in the constructors’ championship, and aside from the arrival of active suspension the other big difference in the 99T was its engine, Honda replacing Renault.

Unlike its predecessors, the 99T was not a particularly potent qualifying car – Ayrton Senna took one pole, as opposed to 15 scored across the previous two campaigns – but the active suspension helped look after the tyres.

Senna used this to finish third in the drivers’ championship and scored eight podiums, including wins at Monaco and Detroit, despite the car’s aerodynamic limitations. Those successes were the first for a car with active suspension F1 – and the last for Team Lotus.

7. Lotus-Renault 97T
Image
Year: 1985
Wins: 3
Drivers’ titles: 0
Constructors titles: 0

Designer Gerard Ducarouge’s 95T was probably unfortunate not to win a race in 1984 but the next car put that right.


The Renault-engined 97T took three victories, the first post-Chapman Lotus to win a world championship race.

New recruit Senna and Elio de Angelis proved a potent line-up, the Brazilian proving faster and taking seven poles to de Angelis’s one, while the Italian had the better finishing record. He only finished five points behind Senna in the standings and Lotus matched Williams’s tally in the 1985 constructors’ table.

The 97T also has a special place in F1 history as the car in which Senna scored his first – and arguably finest – GP victory in appalling conditions at Estoril.


Senna was a leading contender next time out at Imola before running out of fuel, de Angelis taking the win after on-the-road victor Alain Prost’s McLaren was found to be underweight.

Senna would lead more laps than any other driver during the season but had to wait for September’s Belgian GP before adding another victory on his way to fourth in the points.

6. Lotus-Climax 18

Image
Years: 1960-61 (with leading teams)
Wins: 4
Drivers’ titles: 0
Constructors titles: 0

The 18 was Chapman’s real F1 breakthrough. The boxy-looking 18 was his first rear-engined F1 car – and also proved successful as an F2 and Formula Junior chassis with different powerplants.

In Stirling Moss’s hands, Rob Walker’s privately run 18 scored the first world championship pole position and maiden victory for Lotus at the 1960 Monaco GP.

Moss was probably the only driver capable of stopping Cooper duo Jack Brabham and Bruce McLaren dominating the season but his big Spa crash – after a wheel fell off the 18 – meant he missed three GPs, all of which Brabham won.

Lotus still finished second in the constructors’ table and did so again in 1961 as Ferrari dominated, Moss proving the star once more as he took two of his finest victories in Walker-run machinery.


5. Lotus-Ford 78

Image
Years: 1977-78
Wins: 7
Drivers’ titles: 0
Constructors titles: 0

Is this the most-overlooked great F1 Lotus? The 79 often gets the credit for bringing ground-effect – using the ‘sealed’ underbody of the car to create downforce – to F1 but its predecessor got there first.

Mario Andretti and the Lotus 78 was the fastest combination of 1977. The American took more poles and led more laps than any other driver that season, but reliability problems – often due to the more powerful development Cosworth DFV engines the 78 probably didn’t need to win – helped Niki Lauda and Ferrari steal both titles.

Andretti still took four victories, while Gunnar Nilsson added another with a brilliant performance at the Belgian GP.


Andretti and new team-mate Ronnie Peterson took a win apiece at the start of 1978 before the 79 arrived. Perhaps the ultimate Lotus F1 moment came on the 79’s debut at Zolder when Andretti won in the new car and Peterson stormed to second in the old one…


Sadly, the 78’s career ended on a tragic note. Following a practice crash in his 79 at Monza, Peterson switched to a 78 for the Italian GP. He was involved in a startline accident and died after complications set in.

4. Lotus-Ford 79
ImageYears: 1978-79
Wins: 6
Drivers’ titles: 1 (Mario Andretti, 1978)
Constructors’ titles: 1 (1978)

One of the classic F1 game-changers, the 79 was almost untouchable after it arrived for round six of 1978, with only the Michelin-shod Ferrari 312 T3 proving a consistent challenger. The 79 is also one of the finest-looking racing cars ever.

Top 10: Best looking F1 cars ranked - Williams FW14B, Eagle and more

The 79, which built on the ground-effect advancements of the 78, won six of its 11 races in 1978 – and crossed the line first in a seventh (at Monza), only for Andretti to be penalised for jumping the start. It was still enough for him to clinch the drivers’ title, but Peterson’s fatal accident overshadowed the event.

Jean-Pierre Jarier stepped in and was set to win the season-closing Canadian GP when he lost oil pressure, but Lotus had already comfortably secured the constructors’ crown.


The 79’s chief weakness was probably that it wasn’t particularly stiff, meaning that it didn’t make the most of ground-effects. While Chapman pursued the next big step with the ill-fated Lotus 80, rival teams optimised ground-effects in 1979 and Lotus slumped to fourth and no more wins with the 79.

3. Lotus-Ford 49
Image
Years: 1967-70
Wins: 12
Drivers’ titles: 1 (Graham Hill, 1968)
Constructors’ titles: 1 (1968)

The car that brought the Cosworth DFV to F1 – and made it a stressed member – could be higher on this list but for the events of 1967.

The 49 won on its debut at the Dutch GP and took pole for every world championship race thereafter in 1967 in the hands of Jim Clark and Graham Hill. It had the biggest performance advantage of any Lotus and the 10th largest in world championship history, but myriad reliability issues (engine, transmission, suspension) cost Lotus both titles.

Relative to the opposition, the 1967 49 is the fastest F1 car not to secure either the drivers’ or constructors’ championship, but it made up for it the following year. A combination of bad luck for Jackie Stewart and Matra, Ferrari unreliability and a dogged campaign from Hill in the wake of Clark’s death brought Lotus both titles. Jo Siffert also took his Rob Walker-run 49 to a famous win in the British GP.


Jochen Rindt proved rapid in the 49B in 1969 and took five poles but misfortune prevented him from challenging runaway champion Stewart more consistently and he took just one win. But there was still time for one more success, Rindt putting in a famous charge at the 1970 Monaco GP to win in the 49C while Lotus battled to perfect the 72…

2. Lotus-Climax 25/33
Image
Years: 1962-66
Wins: 19
Drivers’ titles: 2 (Jim Clark, 1963 and 1965)
Constructors’ titles: 2 (1963 and 1965)

Perhaps combining these two is cheating, but the 33 was a direct development of the 25, with much of the difference to be found in the suspension to accommodate wider tyres.

The 25 is the reason modern racing cars have monocoque chassis, which are lighter and (in 1962) allowed a reduction in frontal area compared to the hitherto common spaceframe designs.


Clark and the 25 set the pace in 1962, taking six poles and five fastest laps from the nine championship rounds, but – as was sometimes a theme with Chapman’s game-changers – an inability to finish enough races lost both titles, scooped by Hill and BRM.

But the 1963 season was one of the most dominant in F1 history. Clark took seven poles and seven wins from the 10 rounds and led an astonishing 71.5% of the laps. Thanks to the dropped-scores points system of the day, Lotus and Clark took maximum championship tallies as they crushed the opposition.

Clark used the 25 and 33 during 1964. He was again the quickest but appalling reliability in the second half of the year, including at the very end of the title-deciding Mexican GP, meant John Surtees and Ferrari took the titles.

Clark and Lotus reasserted their position in 1965, taking both championships (largely with the 33, though the 25 was wheeled out to win in France!) despite missing the Monaco GP in order to win the Indianapolis 500.

The 33, with two-litre power, was still good enough to take a podium at the 1966 Dutch GP and the 1967 Tasman title in Clark’s hands.




1. Lotus-Ford 72
Image
Years: 1970-75
Wins: 20
Drivers’ titles: 2 (Jochen Rindt 1970, Emerson Fittipaldi 1972)
Constructors’ titles: 3 (190, 1972-73)

Given that Autosport voted the Lotus 72 the greatest competition car of all time in 2020, it should be no surprise to see it top this list.

Like the 25 and 49 before it, the 72 had a troubled early life but, unlike its famous predecessors, the issues were overcome soon enough to deliver a double title success in its first year.


The wedge-shaped 72, which reset the template for single-seater racing cars around the world with its side radiators, also had a longer frontline career and won more world championship races than any other car on this list.

Once the 72 had been sorted, and its anti-squat suspension removed, Rindt went on a run of four consecutive wins in the middle of 1970, which was enough to clinch both the driver’s and constructors’ championship despite the Austrian’s death at Monza.

Trouble getting to grips with Firestone’s new slick tyres made for a winless 1971, but the 72D was on the right track by the end of the campaign. Emerson Fittipaldi then took five wins on his way to beating Stewart to the 1972 crown.

Lotus took both titles that year and could have done in 1973. It had arguably the fastest car, plus Fittipaldi and Peterson on its books, and won the constructors’ championship with seven wins to Tyrrell’s five. But its two stars took points off each other, Peterson suffered some bad luck, and Stewart put in one of the finest F1 campaigns ever to take his third drivers’ title before retiring.



With Fittipaldi at McLaren, Peterson led the charge in 1974 and scored three victories, but the opposition had overtaken Lotus. The failure of the Lotus 76 meant the ageing 72 was pressed into service again in 1975. Predictably, it was not competitive, but its impact on the sport and five world championships had already secured its place in F1 history.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/top-1 ... e/6682160/


OK what do you think and why?

* I started life with nothing, and still have most of it left


“Good drivers have dead flies on the side windows!” (Walter Röhrl)

* I married Miss Right. Just didn't know her first name was Always
User avatar
SBan83
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 3678
Joined: 20 years ago

#2

Post by SBan83 »

Somehow, I expected the 49 to top the list. Whenever I think Lotus, it comes to mind first.
User avatar
Everso Biggyballies
Legendary Member
Legendary Member
Posts: 48992
Joined: 18 years ago
Real Name: Chris
Favourite Motorsport: Anything that goes left and right.
Favourite Racing Car: Too Many to mention
Favourite Driver: Kimi,Niki,Jim(none called Michael)
Favourite Circuit: Nordschleife, Spa, Mt Panorama.
Car(s) Currently Owned: Audi SQ5 3.0L V6 TwinTurbo
Location: Just moved 3 klms further away so now 11 klms from Albert Park, Melbourne.

#3

Post by Everso Biggyballies »

Mr_Ferrari wrote: 2 years ago Somehow, I expected the 49 to top the list. Whenever I think Lotus, it comes to mind first.
Yeah I must admit that was my initial thought as well.

* I started life with nothing, and still have most of it left


“Good drivers have dead flies on the side windows!” (Walter Röhrl)

* I married Miss Right. Just didn't know her first name was Always
User avatar
PTRACER
Forum Administrator
Forum Administrator
Posts: 42138
Joined: 20 years ago
Real Name: Paul
Favourite Motorsport: Formula 1
Favourite Racing Car: Lotus 49
Favourite Driver: Gilles Villeneuve, James Hunt
Favourite Circuit: Nordschleife
Car(s) Currently Owned: Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X JDM
Contact:

#4

Post by PTRACER »

I can see why the Lotus 72 made it on top. How many other manufacturers have designed a car that was successful for so many seasons, basically without any fundamental design changes?
Developer of the 1967v3 Historic Mod for Grand Prix Legends: viewtopic.php?t=17429

King of the Race Track, Destroyer of Tyres, Breaker of Lap Records
User avatar
Michael Ferner
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 3526
Joined: 7 years ago
Real Name: Michael Ferner
Favourite Racing Car: Miller '122', McLaren M23
Favourite Driver: Billy Winn, Bruce McLaren
Car(s) Currently Owned: None
Location: Bitburg, Germany

#5

Post by Michael Ferner »

McLaren M23, Ferrari 500/625, Maserati 250F, Alfa Romeo 158/159, Miller 122/91, Bugatti 35/35C/35T/35B...
2023 'Guess The Pole' Points & Accuracy Champion

If you don't vote now against fascism, you may never have that chance again...


Ceterum censeo interruptiones essent delendam.
User avatar
Michael Ferner
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 3526
Joined: 7 years ago
Real Name: Michael Ferner
Favourite Racing Car: Miller '122', McLaren M23
Favourite Driver: Billy Winn, Bruce McLaren
Car(s) Currently Owned: None
Location: Bitburg, Germany

#6

Post by Michael Ferner »

The problem with this list, there was probably more difference between a 72 and a 72E, or a 49 and a 49C than between the 97T and 99T, but the 25 and 33 are lumped together - where's the consistency? Also, where is the 16? If you include an unremarkable car like the 107, its omission is puzzling to say the least.
2023 'Guess The Pole' Points & Accuracy Champion

If you don't vote now against fascism, you may never have that chance again...


Ceterum censeo interruptiones essent delendam.
Nononsensecapeesh
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 998
Joined: 2 years ago
Favourite Motorsport: British Touring Car Championship
Favourite Driver: Lewis Hamilton

#7

Post by Nononsensecapeesh »

Lotus 72 should always be top of the list I feel.
User avatar
Everso Biggyballies
Legendary Member
Legendary Member
Posts: 48992
Joined: 18 years ago
Real Name: Chris
Favourite Motorsport: Anything that goes left and right.
Favourite Racing Car: Too Many to mention
Favourite Driver: Kimi,Niki,Jim(none called Michael)
Favourite Circuit: Nordschleife, Spa, Mt Panorama.
Car(s) Currently Owned: Audi SQ5 3.0L V6 TwinTurbo
Location: Just moved 3 klms further away so now 11 klms from Albert Park, Melbourne.

#8

Post by Everso Biggyballies »

Adrian Newey will say the Lotus 72

In fact Adrian Newey has always said out of all the cars he did not design, the one car he wishes he had designed was the Lotus 72.

For a bit of light off season reading, from the Motorsport Mag archives back in 2000 he tells us why....


Adrian Newey: 'I wish I'd designed... the Lotus 72'
Formula 1's leading designer for the past 10 years is a man you associate with cool, rational thinking. His choice of favourite racing car, however, is an affair of the heart.

Image

For me it’s the Lotus 72 – an emotional choice as much as a design one. It came out in 1970 when I was 11 and getting interested in motorsport, starting to appreciate the designs. I began to build Tamiya kits. These were very accurate, very good for teaching you the names of the components and how they fitted together. They helped me appreciate the design much more than from just spectating.

The 72 was a pretty big lateral departure from its competitors; the cars at that time were still very much the classic 1960s cigar shape but with wings bolted on as an afterthought. Chapman decided to go the wedge-shaped route, which was relatively novel, designing the car around the aerodynamics rather than vice versa. There was no airflow management underneath the 72, it was a first step but it was saying, ‘Let’s think about the aerodynamics from the root of the design.’

It was one of the first to have its radiators ahead of the rear wheels; that follows on from the wedge shape, which dictates very little space in the nose. I imagine that was partly for penetration, letting the front wings work as well as possible, and partly because it’s a good packaging solution, with short pipe runs and keeping the weight of the radiators central, reducing the polar moment. An elegant solution, mechanically and aerodynamically.

Image

Newey appreciates the departure in design the Lotus 72 represents from the trends of the time

It had torsion-bar suspension – not the first car to use it in F1, but it reintroduced the concept presumably for reduced weight and better packaging than a coil spring.

But you’re creating an extra problem because you can’t buy ready-made torsion bars like you can springs it’s a question of how you push design against production. Modern F1 cars, without exception, have torsion-bar front suspension, and most have it at the rear too, so it’s a trend that has been followed several years later, though not necessarily for the same reasons.

Lotus did a neat job of installing inboard front brakes while ‘tweeting the wedge shape, with those little conning towers to extract the air. Today, carbon discs and light calipers form a relatively small percentage of the unsprung weight, but they were using iron discs and heavy calipers, so, especially with the small front wheels of the time, the brakes were a big fraction of the unsprung weight, hence moving them inboard.

I’d not seen a Lotus 72 since I was a teenager, and when I saw one a couple of years ago I was surprised at how big it was. I had the impression at the time that it was rather small, but now the monocoque seems broad. Cars have got much slimmer now, a reflection of progress, not a criticism of the 72.

In the early years Chapman was very much the designer and engineer, but Maurice Phillippe was heavily involved from the Lotus 49 onwards, so it’s less clear who was responsible for what. It’s probably true that, latterly, Chapman was getting more credit than he was due, when it was people working for him who were coming up with the ideas. But nevertheless there’s no doubt he was a highly talented and ingenious designer.

The 72 prompted people to think about how to integrate the aerodynamics into the design, with broader wings a better overall package. Whether they copied it, or it simply triggered fresh ideas, it pushed current thinking into new areas. In my own case, when we introduced the March 881, the Leyton House car, it was smaller than anything else. It was running at the end of the turbo era, which had produced engines of enormous horsepower and, with that, rather big, clumsy-looking cars. The smaller 881 integrated the aerodynamics in a different way, and while there were a few direct copies the following year, it forced people to re-evaluate their thinking. That was a rewarding achievement for me, even if the car didn’t win a race.

One of the things which has changed, and it’s a double-edged sword, is that, in the days of the 72, the level of design was, dare I say it, relatively low, simply because there were fewer research resources available. So they weren’t able to quantify whether the wedge shape was the way to go, or whether the extra complication of inboard discs was justified, because they never tried it with outboard brakes.

Now we have the budget and tools which allow us to quantify those. I enjoy that, because it means that any decision you make is less black art and more based on science. Before you even manufacture something, you know which direction to follow. I think it was quite common in those days for people to produce a new car which wasn’t as good as they’d hoped, and not to understand why. You might take two steps forward and one back and still be pleased with yourself because you had made some progress. In a way it would be exciting because you would have to use your intuition, yet if you’d made a mistake and couldn’t understand why, it must have been be very frustrating.

I try to be inventive in my designs, but the more restrictive the regs become, the more difficult it is to pursue new avenues. I’d much prefer more open regulations. There’s more technical freedom in designing a road car than designing an F1 car, which is an anomaly the rule-makers might consider.

Whether it’s to the detriment of the sport depends on how you weigh competition against the design element; if you feel it should be a battle between drivers, not of technology, then regs which produce similar cars are the way to go. Personally I think the sport should be a blend of technology and driver skill; it’s one of the things that makes it fascinating.
https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/arch ... 4/lotus-72

* I started life with nothing, and still have most of it left


“Good drivers have dead flies on the side windows!” (Walter Röhrl)

* I married Miss Right. Just didn't know her first name was Always
Post Reply