Bottom post of the previous page:
Not here, but I've seen similar arguments elsewhere.
Bottom post of the previous page:
Not here, but I've seen similar arguments elsewhere.
So @DoubleFart is just venting here instead of where the arguments are being made?
I imagine he's having a vent because in the UK there would probably be a lot more Lewis lovers.
If we're restricted to talking about nothing but the comments of 10 or so active members on this forum, we're somewhat stuck for content aren't we?
Ok, let’s make this interesting:DoubleFart wrote: ↑2 years agoIf we're restricted to talking about nothing but the comments of 10 or so active members on this forum, we're somewhat stuck for content aren't we?
Stealth wealth is definitely the way to go.
You need to average $352,000 a year for 50 years to earn 5% of what Lewis has nowjimclark wrote: ↑2 years ago Interesting premise, however, there are those that don't dress as ridiculously that have more.
Thus, I must ask, what, who, and especially...why in the first place, determines what is "too much" for one, and not another?
As long as it wasn't acquired illegally, I don't see how it's anyone's business to even consider it.
Seriously, I prolly haven't earned 5% of what he's got and don't resent his situation at all; 'just wish I had the smarts and talent to duplicate the feat (minus his taste in clothing).....
Oh my goodness, that shirt is......... oh dear. The shoes make his feet look huge too. It's a choice that's for sure. Not one I'd make, but there you go.MonteCristo wrote: ↑2 years ago It's pronounced FUSHION, darling.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/a ... -Gala.html