Bottom post of the previous page:
Oh I totally agree on the last bit, that was err, cringeworthy every time I saw it.kals wrote: ↑6 years agoI understand your point however they aren't apples for apples comparisons. Like I said elsewhere, the downside of this decision is that people have lost a source of income. The upside is that we don't need to witness those cringeworthy displays of women applauding men which didn't add anything to the sport.Ian-S wrote: ↑6 years ago No surprise, just a shame that as usual, the vocal minority won out and Liberty bowed to their will.
So it's ok for the young girls to get their kit off in front of a camera and then plaster it all over the internet as long as it's in a studio, but it's not ok to have one standing at the front of an F1 car holding a position marker?
As said elsewhere, if this was truly about objectifying people, when will Boxing make the boxers wear shirts when in the ring, and when will we see an end to scantily clad women in music videos? Oh and of course, no more nudity on TV please, can't have actors slowing flesh anymore.
It is an apples to apples comparison, or rather it's selective morals if you (not you kals but generally) think grid girls should be banned because it portrays women as being exploited for their looks, but it's fine for singers to perform in their underwear in a music video or an actress to perform a fake sex scene or walk naked through a scene, that's what those of us that live in the real world call double standards because all three examples are portraying a person in a sexual way to the viewer.
I wasn't comparing grid girls to porn stars though, just merely pointing out the double standards on display from certain quarters, and I'm not even going to bring up the equally questionable morals of formula one continuing to go to places like China and Russia whilst at the same time as taking the moral high ground with grid girls.
Edit: Erwin beat me to it lol.